Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > elab3gf | GIF version |
Description: Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 2685. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elab3gf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
elab3gf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
elab3gf.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elab3gf | ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | elab3gf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | elab3gf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
3 | elab3gf.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elabgf 2685 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
5 | 4 | ibi 165 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜓) |
6 | 1, 2, 3 | elabgf 2685 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
7 | 6 | imim2i 12 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))) |
8 | bi2 121 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
9 | 7, 8 | syli 33 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) |
10 | 5, 9 | impbid2 131 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 98 = wceq 1243 Ⅎwnf 1349 ∈ wcel 1393 {cab 2026 Ⅎwnfc 2165 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-v 2559 |
This theorem is referenced by: elab3g 2693 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |