Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difjust GIF version

Theorem difjust 2919
 Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-dif 2920. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difjust {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem difjust
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eleq1 2100 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐴𝑧𝐴))
2 eleq1 2100 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑧𝐵))
32notbid 592 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (¬ 𝑥𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑧𝐵))
41, 3anbi12d 442 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)))
54cbvabv 2161 . 2 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)}
6 eleq1 2100 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐴𝑦𝐴))
7 eleq1 2100 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐵𝑦𝐵))
87notbid 592 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑧𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑦𝐵))
96, 8anbi12d 442 . . 3 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵) ↔ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)))
109cbvabv 2161 . 2 {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
115, 10eqtri 2060 1 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 97   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  {cab 2026 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator