Theorem difab 3206

Description: Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem difab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-clab 2027	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
2		sban 1829	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2027	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4	3	bicomi 123	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
5		sbn 1826	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
6		df-clab 2027	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
7	5, 6	xchbinxr 608	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
8	4, 7	anbi12i 433	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
9	1, 2, 8	3bitrri 196	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
10	9	difeqri 3064	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 97   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  [wsb 1645  {cab 2026   ∖ cdif 2914

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-dif 2920

This theorem is referenced by:  notab  3207  difrab  3211  notrab  3214  imadiflem  4978  imadif  4979