Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difab GIF version

Theorem difab 3206
 Description: Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difab ({𝑥𝜑} ∖ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem difab
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-clab 2027 . . 3 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
2 sban 1829 . . 3 ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓))
3 df-clab 2027 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
43bicomi 123 . . . 4 ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑})
5 sbn 1826 . . . . 5 ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
6 df-clab 2027 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
75, 6xchbinxr 608 . . . 4 ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓})
84, 7anbi12i 433 . . 3 (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}))
91, 2, 83bitrri 196 . 2 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
109difeqri 3064 1 ({𝑥𝜑} ∖ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 97   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  [wsb 1645  {cab 2026   ∖ cdif 2914 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-dif 2920 This theorem is referenced by:  notab  3207  difrab  3211  notrab  3214  imadiflem  4978  imadif  4979
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator