Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dfss2f | GIF version |
Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfss2f.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
dfss2f.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfss2f | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfss2 2934 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
2 | dfss2f.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
3 | 2 | nfcri 2172 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 |
4 | dfss2f.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
5 | 4 | nfcri 2172 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 |
6 | 3, 5 | nfim 1464 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) |
7 | nfv 1421 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | |
8 | eleq1 2100 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
9 | eleq1 2100 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
10 | 8, 9 | imbi12d 223 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) |
11 | 6, 7, 10 | cbval 1637 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
12 | 1, 11 | bitri 173 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 98 ∀wal 1241 ∈ wcel 1393 Ⅎwnfc 2165 ⊆ wss 2917 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-in 2924 df-ss 2931 |
This theorem is referenced by: dfss3f 2937 ssrd 2950 ss2ab 3008 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |