![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dedhb | GIF version |
Description: A deduction theorem for converting the inference ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 => ⊢ 𝜑 into a closed theorem. Use nfa1 1434 and nfab 2182 to eliminate the hypothesis of the substitution instance 𝜓 of the inference. For converting the inference form into a deduction form, abidnf 2709 is useful. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dedhb.1 | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
dedhb.2 | ⊢ 𝜓 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dedhb | ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dedhb.2 | . 2 ⊢ 𝜓 | |
2 | abidnf 2709 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴) | |
3 | 2 | eqcomd 2045 | . . 3 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) |
4 | dedhb.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | syl 14 | . 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
6 | 1, 5 | mpbiri 157 | 1 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 98 ∀wal 1241 = wceq 1243 ∈ wcel 1393 {cab 2026 Ⅎwnfc 2165 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-11 1397 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |