Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > con2biidc | GIF version |
Description: A contraposition inference. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Mar-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
con2biidc.1 | ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
con2biidc | ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | con2biidc.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) | |
2 | 1 | bicomd 129 | . . 3 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) |
3 | 2 | con1biidc 771 | . 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
4 | 3 | bicomd 129 | 1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 98 DECID wdc 742 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-in1 544 ax-in2 545 ax-io 630 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-dc 743 |
This theorem is referenced by: dfexdc 1390 nnedc 2211 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |