![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ceqsrexbv | GIF version |
Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsrexv.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsrexbv | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | r19.42v 2467 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | eleq1 2100 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
3 | 2 | adantr 261 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) |
4 | 3 | pm5.32ri 428 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | 4 | bicomi 123 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 5 | baib 828 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | 6 | rexbiia 2339 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
8 | ceqsrexv.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
9 | 8 | ceqsrexv 2674 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
10 | 9 | pm5.32i 427 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
11 | 1, 7, 10 | 3bitr3i 199 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 = wceq 1243 ∈ wcel 1393 ∃wrex 2307 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-rex 2312 df-v 2559 |
This theorem is referenced by: frecsuclem3 5990 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |