Theorem ceqsrexbv 2675

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexbv	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexbv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.42v 2467	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
2		eleq1 2100	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	adantr 261	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	pm5.32ri 428	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	bicomi 123	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	baib 828	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	rexbiia 2339	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8		ceqsrexv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	8	ceqsrexv 2674	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
10	9	pm5.32i 427	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
11	1, 7, 10	3bitr3i 199	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  ∃wrex 2307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  frecsuclem3  5990