Theorem cbvrab 2555

Description: Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvrab.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
cbvrab.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvrab.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvrab.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvrab.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrab	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Proof of Theorem cbvrab

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1421	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
2		cbvrab.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2172	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4		nfs1v 1815	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
5	3, 4	nfan 1457	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
6		eleq1 2100	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
7		sbequ12 1654	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 442	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9	1, 5, 8	cbvab 2160	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)}
10		cbvrab.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
11	10	nfcri 2172	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
12		cbvrab.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
13	12	nfsb 1822	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
14	11, 13	nfan 1457	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
15		nfv 1421	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)
16		eleq1 2100	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
17		sbequ 1721	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
18		cbvrab.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
19		cbvrab.5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
20	18, 19	sbie 1674	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
21	17, 20	syl6bb 185	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
22	16, 21	anbi12d 442	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
23	14, 15, 22	cbvab 2160	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
24	9, 23	eqtri 2060	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
25		df-rab 2315	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
26		df-rab 2315	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
27	24, 25, 26	3eqtr4i 2070	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   = wceq 1243  Ⅎwnf 1349   ∈ wcel 1393  [wsb 1645  {cab 2026  Ⅎwnfc 2165  {crab 2310

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rab 2315

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrabv  2556  elrabsf  2801  tfis  4306