Theorem bdsep2 10006

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 10004 with one DV condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 10005 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdsep2.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsep2	⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem bdsep2

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2101	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎))
2	1	anbi1d 438	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1705	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1706	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		bdsep2.1	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
7	6	bdsep1 10005	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 7	chvarv 1812	1 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98  ∀wal 1241  ∃wex 1381  BOUNDED wbd 9932

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-ext 2022  ax-bdsep 10004

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036

This theorem is referenced by:  bdsepnft  10007  bdsepnfALT  10009