Theorem bdreu 9975

Description: Boundedness of existential uniqueness.

Remark regarding restricted quantifiers: the formula ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 need not be bounded even if 𝐴 and 𝜑 are. Indeed, V is bounded by bdcvv 9977, and ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑) (in minimal propositional calculus), so by bd0 9944, if ∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 were bounded when 𝜑 is bounded, then ∀𝑥𝜑 would be bounded as well when 𝜑 is bounded, which is not the case. The same remark holds with ∃, ∃!, ∃*. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdreu.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdreu	⊢ BOUNDED ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bdreu

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdreu.1	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	ax-bdex 9939	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑
3		ax-bdeq 9940	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 = 𝑧
4	1, 3	ax-bdim 9934	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
5	4	ax-bdal 9938	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
6	5	ax-bdex 9939	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
7	2, 6	ax-bdan 9935	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
8		reu3 2731	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
9	7, 8	bd0r 9945	1 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97  ∀wral 2306  ∃wrex 2307  ∃!wreu 2308  BOUNDED wbd 9932

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-bd0 9933  ax-bdim 9934  ax-bdan 9935  ax-bdal 9938  ax-bdex 9939  ax-bdeq 9940

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-reu 2313  df-rmo 2314

This theorem is referenced by:  bdrmo  9976