Theorem ax11e 1677

Description: Analogue to ax-11 1397 but for existential quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2017.) (Proved by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11e	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem ax11e

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equs5e 1676	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
2	1	19.21bi 1450	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
3	2	com12 27	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   = wceq 1243  ∃wex 1381

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-11 1397  ax-4 1400  ax-ial 1427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110

This theorem is referenced by:  ax10oe  1678  drex1  1679  sbcof2  1691  ax11ev  1709