Theorem acexmidlemv 5510

Description: Lemma for acexmid 5511.

This is acexmid 5511 with additional distinct variable constraints, most notably between 𝜑 and 𝑥.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
acexmidlemv.choice	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
acexmidlemv	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢

Proof of Theorem acexmidlemv

Dummy variables 𝑠 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		onsucelsucexmidlem 4254	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ On
2		pp0ex 3940	. . . . 5 ⊢ {∅, {∅}} ∈ V
3	2	rabex 3901	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ V
4		prexg 3947	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ On ∧ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ V) → {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} ∈ V)
5	1, 3, 4	mp2an 402	. . 3 ⊢ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} ∈ V
6		raleq 2505	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)))
7	6	exbidv 1706	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} → (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)))
8		acexmidlemv.choice	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)
9	5, 7, 8	vtocl 2608	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)
10		eqeq1 2046	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → (𝑠 = ∅ ↔ 𝑡 = ∅))
11	10	orbi1d 705	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → ((𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑡 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)))
12	11	cbvrabv 2556	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} = {𝑡 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑡 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}
13		eqeq1 2046	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → (𝑠 = {∅} ↔ 𝑡 = {∅}))
14	13	orbi1d 705	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → ((𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑡 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)))
15	14	cbvrabv 2556	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} = {𝑡 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑡 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}
16		eqid 2040	. . . 4 ⊢ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} = {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}
17	12, 15, 16	acexmidlem2 5509	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
18	17	exlimiv 1489	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
19	9, 18	ax-mp 7	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 97   ∨ wo 629   = wceq 1243  ∃wex 1381   ∈ wcel 1393  ∀wral 2306  ∃wrex 2307  ∃!wreu 2308  {crab 2310  Vcvv 2557  ∅c0 3224  {csn 3375  {cpr 3376  Oncon0 4100

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-nul 3883  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3or 886  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-reu 2313  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-nul 3225  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-uni 3581  df-tr 3855  df-iord 4103  df-on 4105  df-suc 4108  df-iota 4867  df-riota 5468

This theorem is referenced by:  acexmid  5511