Theorem 3anandirs 1238

Description: Inference that undistributes a triple conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (Revised by NM, 18-Apr-2007.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3anandirs.1	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3anandirs	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Proof of Theorem 3anandirs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl1 907	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑)
2		simpr 103	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃)
3		simpl2 908	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)
4		simpl3 909	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)
5		3anandirs.1	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
6	1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2, 5	syl222anc 1151	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ∧ w3a 885

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887

This theorem is referenced by: (None)