Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 3adant3r2 | GIF version |
Description: Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2008.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3exp.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3adant3r2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3exp.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
2 | 1 | 3expb 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
3 | 2 | 3adantr2 1064 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ∧ w3a 885 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-3an 887 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |