ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  0xp GIF version

Theorem 0xp 4420
Description: The cross product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
0xp (∅ × 𝐴) = ∅

Proof of Theorem 0xp
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 elxp 4362 . . 3 (𝑧 ∈ (∅ × 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴)))
2 noel 3228 . . . . . . 7 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅
3 simprl 483 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ∅)
42, 3mto 588 . . . . . 6 ¬ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴))
54nex 1389 . . . . 5 ¬ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴))
65nex 1389 . . . 4 ¬ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴))
7 noel 3228 . . . 4 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ ∅
86, 72false 617 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴)) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ ∅)
91, 8bitri 173 . 2 (𝑧 ∈ (∅ × 𝐴) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ ∅)
109eqriv 2037 1 (∅ × 𝐴) = ∅
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 97   = wceq 1243  wex 1381  wcel 1393  c0 3224  cop 3378   × cxp 4343
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-nul 3225  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-opab 3819  df-xp 4351
This theorem is referenced by:  res0  4616  xp0  4743  xpeq0r  4746  xpdisj1  4747  xpima1  4767
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator