Theorem suppssof1 5728

Description: Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssof1.s	|- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssof1.o	|- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
suppssof1.a	|- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
suppssof1.b	|- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
suppssof1.d	|- ( ph -> D e. W )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssof1	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, v   v, B   v, O   v, R   v, Y   v, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( v)   D( v)   L( v)   V( v)   W( v)

Proof of Theorem suppssof1

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		suppssof1.a	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
2		ffn 5046	. . . . . 6 |- ( A : D --> V -> A Fn D )
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> A Fn D )
4		suppssof1.b	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
5		ffn 5046	. . . . . 6 |- ( B : D --> R -> B Fn D )
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B Fn D )
7		suppssof1.d	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> D e. W )
8		inidm 3146	. . . . 5 |- ( D i^i D ) = D
9		eqidd 2041	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) = ( A ` x ) )
10		eqidd 2041	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) = ( B ` x ) )
11	3, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10	offval 5719	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( A oF O B ) = ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
12	11	cnveqd 4511	. . 3 |- ( ph -> `' ( A oF O B ) = `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
13	12	imaeq1d 4667	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) )
14	1	feqmptd 5226	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A = ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
15	14	cnveqd 4511	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> `' A = `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
16	15	imaeq1d 4667	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17		suppssof1.s	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
18	16, 17	eqsstr3d 2980	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
19		suppssof1.o	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
20		funfvex 5192	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun A /\ x e. dom A ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
21	20	funfni 4999	. . . 4 |- ( ( A Fn D /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
22	3, 21	sylan 267	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
23	4	ffvelrnda 5302	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) e. R )
24	18, 19, 22, 23	suppssov1 5709	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
25	13, 24	eqsstrd 2979	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   _Vcvv 2557   \ cdif 2914   C_ wss 2917   {csn 3375   |-> cmpt 3818   `'ccnv 4344   "cima 4348   Fn wfn 4897   -->wf 4898   ` cfv 4902  (class class class)co 5512   oFcof 5710

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-coll 3872  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944  ax-setind 4262

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ne 2206  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-reu 2313  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765  df-csb 2853  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-uni 3581  df-iun 3659  df-br 3765  df-opab 3819  df-mpt 3820  df-id 4030  df-xp 4351  df-rel 4352  df-cnv 4353  df-co 4354  df-dm 4355  df-rn 4356  df-res 4357  df-ima 4358  df-iota 4867  df-fun 4904  df-fn 4905  df-f 4906  df-f1 4907  df-fo 4908  df-f1o 4909  df-fv 4910  df-ov 5515  df-oprab 5516  df-mpt2 5517  df-of 5712

This theorem is referenced by: (None)