Theorem rspcimdv 2657

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	|- ( ph -> A e. B )
rspcimdv.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv	|- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ph, x   ch, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem rspcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 2311	. 2 |- ( A. x e. B ps <-> A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) )
2		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A e. B )
3		simpr 103	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x = A )
4	3	eleq1d 2106	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
5	4	biimprd 147	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( A e. B -> x e. B ) )
6		rspcimdv.2	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )
7	5, 6	imim12d 68	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ( A e. B -> ch ) ) )
8	2, 7	spcimdv 2637	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ( A e. B -> ch ) ) )
9	2, 8	mpid 37	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ch ) )
10	1, 9	syl5bi 141	1 |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   A.wal 1241   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   A.wral 2306

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcdv  2659