Theorem rspce 2651

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc.1	|- F/ x ps
rspc.2	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspce	|- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem rspce

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcv 2178	. . . 4 |- F/_ x A
2		nfv 1421	. . . . 5 |- F/ x A e. B
3		rspc.1	. . . . 5 |- F/ x ps
4	2, 3	nfan 1457	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( A e. B /\ ps )
5		eleq1 2100	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
6		rspc.2	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
7	5, 6	anbi12d 442	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) ) )
8	1, 4, 7	spcegf 2636	. . 3 |- ( A e. B -> ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) )
9	8	anabsi5 513	. 2 |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x ( x e. B /\ ph ) )
10		df-rex 2312	. 2 |- ( E. x e. B ph <-> E. x ( x e. B /\ ph ) )
11	9, 10	sylibr 137	1 |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   = wceq 1243   F/wnf 1349   E.wex 1381   e. wcel 1393   E.wrex 2307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcev  2656