Theorem pm3.2im 566

Description: In classical logic, this is just a restatement of pm3.2 126. In intuitionistic logic, it still holds, but is weaker than pm3.2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm3.2im	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> -. ( ph -> -. ps ) ) )

Proof of Theorem pm3.2im

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.27 35	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( ph -> -. ps ) -> -. ps ) )
2	1	con2d 554	1 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> -. ( ph -> -. ps ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545

This theorem is referenced by:  expi  567  jc  580  expt  583  imnan  624  dfandc  778