Theorem opabbid 3822

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	|- F/ x ph
opabbid.2	|- F/ y ph
opabbid.3	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	|- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } = { <. x , y >. | ch } )

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 |- F/ x ph
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 |- F/ y ph
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
4	3	anbi2d 437	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
5	2, 4	exbid 1507	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
6	1, 5	exbid 1507	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) <-> E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) ) )
7	6	abbidv 2155	. 2 |- ( ph -> { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) } )
8		df-opab 3819	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ps } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ps ) }
9		df-opab 3819	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ch } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ch ) }
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2097	1 |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } = { <. x , y >. | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   = wceq 1243   F/wnf 1349   E.wex 1381   {cab 2026   <.cop 3378   {copab 3817

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-11 1397  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-opab 3819

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  3823  mpteq12f  3837  fnoprabg  5602