Theorem frforeq2 4082

Description: Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frforeq2	|- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )

Proof of Theorem frforeq2

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq 2505	. . . . 5 |- ( A = B -> ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) <-> A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) ) )
2	1	imbi1d 220	. . . 4 |- ( A = B -> ( ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) <-> ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) ) )
3	2	raleqbi1dv 2513	. . 3 |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) <-> A. x e. B ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) ) )
4		sseq1 2966	. . 3 |- ( A = B -> ( A C_ T <-> B C_ T ) )
5	3, 4	imbi12d 223	. 2 |- ( A = B -> ( ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> A C_ T ) <-> ( A. x e. B ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> B C_ T ) ) )
6		df-frfor 4068	. 2 |- (FrFor R A T <-> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> A C_ T ) )
7		df-frfor 4068	. 2 |- (FrFor R B T <-> ( A. x e. B ( A. y e. B ( y R x -> y e. T ) -> x e. T ) -> B C_ T ) )
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4g 212	1 |- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 98   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   A.wral 2306   C_ wss 2917   class class class wbr 3764  FrFor wfrfor 4064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-frfor 4068

This theorem is referenced by:  freq2  4083