Theorem eqvinop 3980

Description: A variable introduction law for ordered pairs. Analog of Lemma 15 of [Monk2] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eqvinop.1	|- B e. _V
eqvinop.2	|- C e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvinop	|- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   x, B, y   x, C, y

Proof of Theorem eqvinop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqvinop.1	. . . . . . . 8 |- B e. _V
2		eqvinop.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- C e. _V
3	1, 2	opth2 3977	. . . . . . 7 |- ( <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. <-> ( x = B /\ y = C ) )
4	3	anbi2i 430	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x = B /\ y = C ) ) )
5		ancom 253	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x = B /\ y = C ) ) <-> ( ( x = B /\ y = C ) /\ A = <. x , y >. ) )
6		anass 381	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x = B /\ y = C ) /\ A = <. x , y >. ) <-> ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
7	4, 5, 6	3bitri 195	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
8	7	exbii 1496	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> E. y ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
9		19.42v 1786	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) <-> ( x = B /\ E. y ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
10		opeq2 3550	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y = C -> <. x , y >. = <. x , C >. )
11	10	eqeq2d 2051	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = C -> ( A = <. x , y >. <-> A = <. x , C >. ) )
12	2, 11	ceqsexv 2593	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) <-> A = <. x , C >. )
13	12	anbi2i 430	. . . 4 |- ( ( x = B /\ E. y ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) <-> ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) )
14	8, 9, 13	3bitri 195	. . 3 |- ( E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) )
15	14	exbii 1496	. 2 |- ( E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> E. x ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) )
16		opeq1 3549	. . . 4 |- ( x = B -> <. x , C >. = <. B , C >. )
17	16	eqeq2d 2051	. . 3 |- ( x = B -> ( A = <. x , C >. <-> A = <. B , C >. ) )
18	1, 17	ceqsexv 2593	. 2 |- ( E. x ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) <-> A = <. B , C >. )
19	15, 18	bitr2i 174	1 |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   = wceq 1243   E.wex 1381   e. wcel 1393   _Vcvv 2557   <.cop 3378

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384

This theorem is referenced by:  copsexg  3981  ralxpf  4482  rexxpf  4483  oprabid  5537