Theorem elab1 9922

Description: One implication of elab 2687. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
elab1.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elab1	|- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )

Distinct variable groups:   ps, x   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem elab1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1421	. 2 |- F/ x ps
2		elab1.1	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )
3	1, 2	elabf1 9920	1 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   {cab 2026

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by: (None)