Theorem ecovcom 6213

Description: Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6214 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ecovcom.1	|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )
ecovcom.2	|- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )
ecovcom.3	|- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )
ecovcom.4	|- D = H
ecovcom.5	|- G = J

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecovcom	|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, w, A   z, B, w   x, .+ , y, z, w   x, .~ , y, z, w   x, S, y, z, w   z, C, w

Allowed substitution hints:   B( x, y)   C( x, y)   D( x, y, z, w)   G( x, y, z, w)   H( x, y, z, w)   J( x, y, z, w)

Proof of Theorem ecovcom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecovcom.1	. 2 |- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )
2		oveq1 5519	. . 3 |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ = A -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = ( A .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) )
3		oveq2 5520	. . 3 |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ = A -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ A ) )
4	2, 3	eqeq12d 2054	. 2 |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ = A -> ( ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) <-> ( A .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ A ) ) )
5		oveq2 5520	. . 3 |- ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ = B -> ( A .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = ( A .+ B ) )
6		oveq1 5519	. . 3 |- ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ = B -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ A ) = ( B .+ A ) )
7	5, 6	eqeq12d 2054	. 2 |- ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ = B -> ( ( A .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ A ) <-> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) ) )
8		ecovcom.4	. . . 4 |- D = H
9		ecovcom.5	. . . 4 |- G = J
10		opeq12 3551	. . . . 5 |- ( ( D = H /\ G = J ) -> <. D , G >. = <. H , J >. )
11	10	eceq1d 6142	. . . 4 |- ( ( D = H /\ G = J ) -> [ <. D , G >. ] .~ = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )
12	8, 9, 11	mp2an 402	. . 3 |- [ <. D , G >. ] .~ = [ <. H , J >. ] .~
13		ecovcom.2	. . 3 |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )
14		ecovcom.3	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )
15	14	ancoms 255	. . 3 |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )
16	12, 13, 15	3eqtr4a 2098	. 2 |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) )
17	1, 4, 7, 16	2ecoptocl 6194	1 |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   <.cop 3378   X. cxp 4343  (class class class)co 5512   [cec 6104   /.cqs 6105

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-uni 3581  df-br 3765  df-opab 3819  df-xp 4351  df-cnv 4353  df-dm 4355  df-rn 4356  df-res 4357  df-ima 4358  df-iota 4867  df-fv 4910  df-ov 5515  df-ec 6108  df-qs 6112

This theorem is referenced by: (None)