Theorem dfoprab3 5817

Description: Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3.1	|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3	|- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, ph   ps, w   x, z, w, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( z, w)   ps( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab3s 5816	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps ) }
2		vex 2560	. . . . . 6 |- w e. _V
3		1stexg 5794	. . . . . 6 |- ( w e. _V -> ( 1st ` w ) e. _V )
4	2, 3	ax-mp 7	. . . . 5 |- ( 1st ` w ) e. _V
5		2ndexg 5795	. . . . . 6 |- ( w e. _V -> ( 2nd ` w ) e. _V )
6	2, 5	ax-mp 7	. . . . 5 |- ( 2nd ` w ) e. _V
7		eqcom 2042	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = ( 1st ` w ) <-> ( 1st ` w ) = x )
8		eqcom 2042	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y = ( 2nd ` w ) <-> ( 2nd ` w ) = y )
9	7, 8	anbi12i 433	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) <-> ( ( 1st ` w ) = x /\ ( 2nd ` w ) = y ) )
10		eqopi 5798	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` w ) = x /\ ( 2nd ` w ) = y ) ) -> w = <. x , y >. )
11	9, 10	sylan2b 271	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) ) -> w = <. x , y >. )
12		dfoprab3.1	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
13	11, 12	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
14	13	bicomd 129	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) ) -> ( ps <-> ph ) )
15	14	ex 108	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) -> ( ps <-> ph ) ) )
16	4, 6, 15	sbc2iedv 2830	. . . 4 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps <-> ph ) )
17	16	pm5.32i 427	. . 3 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps ) <-> ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) )
18	17	opabbii 3824	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps ) } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) }
19	1, 18	eqtr2i 2061	1 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   _Vcvv 2557   [.wsbc 2764   <.cop 3378   {copab 3817   X. cxp 4343   ` cfv 4902   {coprab 5513   1stc1st 5765   2ndc2nd 5766

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-13 1404  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944  ax-un 4170

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-uni 3581  df-br 3765  df-opab 3819  df-mpt 3820  df-id 4030  df-xp 4351  df-rel 4352  df-cnv 4353  df-co 4354  df-dm 4355  df-rn 4356  df-iota 4867  df-fun 4904  df-fn 4905  df-f 4906  df-fo 4908  df-fv 4910  df-oprab 5516  df-1st 5767  df-2nd 5768

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab4  5818  df1st2  5840  df2nd2  5841