Definition df-er 6106

Description: Define the equivalence relation predicate. Our notation is not standard. A formal notation doesn't seem to exist in the literature; instead only informal English tends to be used. The present definition, although somewhat cryptic, nicely avoids dummy variables. In dfer2 6107 we derive a more typical definition. We show that an equivalence relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive in erref 6126, ersymb 6120, and ertr 6121. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
df-er	|- ( R Er A <-> ( Rel R /\ dom R = A /\ ( `' R u. ( R o. R ) ) C_ R ) )

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-er

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cA	. . 3 class A
2		cR	. . 3 class R
3	1, 2	wer 6103	. 2 wff R Er A
4	2	wrel 4350	. . 3 wff Rel R
5	2	cdm 4345	. . . 4 class dom R
6	5, 1	wceq 1243	. . 3 wff dom R = A
7	2	ccnv 4344	. . . . 5 class `' R
8	2, 2	ccom 4349	. . . . 5 class ( R o. R )
9	7, 8	cun 2915	. . . 4 class ( `' R u. ( R o. R ) )
10	9, 2	wss 2917	. . 3 wff ( `' R u. ( R o. R ) ) C_ R
11	4, 6, 10	w3a 885	. 2 wff ( Rel R /\ dom R = A /\ ( `' R u. ( R o. R ) ) C_ R )
12	3, 11	wb 98	1 wff ( R Er A <-> ( Rel R /\ dom R = A /\ ( `' R u. ( R o. R ) ) C_ R ) )

This definition is referenced by:  dfer2  6107  ereq1  6113  ereq2  6114  errel  6115  erdm  6116  ersym  6118  ertr  6121  xpiderm  6177