Theorem dedhb 2710

Description: A deduction theorem for converting the inference |- F/_ x A => |- ph into a closed theorem. Use nfa1 1434 and nfab 2182 to eliminate the hypothesis of the substitution instance ps of the inference. For converting the inference form into a deduction form, abidnf 2709 is useful. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dedhb.1	|- ( A = { z | A. x z e. A } -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
dedhb.2	|- ps

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dedhb	|- ( F/_ x A -> ph )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   z, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, z)   ps( x, z)   A( x)

Proof of Theorem dedhb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dedhb.2	. 2 |- ps
2		abidnf 2709	. . . 4 |- ( F/_ x A -> { z | A. x z e. A } = A )
3	2	eqcomd 2045	. . 3 |- ( F/_ x A -> A = { z | A. x z e. A } )
4		dedhb.1	. . 3 |- ( A = { z | A. x z e. A } -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
5	3, 4	syl 14	. 2 |- ( F/_ x A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
6	1, 5	mpbiri 157	1 |- ( F/_ x A -> ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   {cab 2026   F/_wnfc 2165

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-11 1397  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167

This theorem is referenced by: (None)