Theorem bdsepnf 10008

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 10004 with one DV condition removed, the other DV condition replaced by a non-freeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 10009. Use bdsep1 10005 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf.nf	|- F/ b ph
bdsepnf.1	|- BOUNDED ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf	|- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Distinct variable group:   a, b, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, a, b)

Proof of Theorem bdsepnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdsepnf.1	. . 3 |- BOUNDED ph
2	1	bdsepnft 10007	. 2 |- ( A. x F/ b ph -> E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) )
3		bdsepnf.nf	. 2 |- F/ b ph
4	2, 3	mpg 1340	1 |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   F/wnf 1349   E.wex 1381  BOUNDED wbd 9932

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-bdsep 10004

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036

This theorem is referenced by: (None)